Specialized provider of Maritime Solutions in the areas of Quality, Health, Safety, Environmental, Security and Risk Management.
Header

USCG / PSA 2-15 – Conditions of entry for vessels arriving at U.S. ports

18 Μαΐου, 2015 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG / PSA 2-15 – Conditions of entry for vessels arriving at U.S. ports)

The US Coast Guard (USCG) issued a Port Security Advisory (PSA) announcing that, effective 24 April 2015, it is imposing conditions of entry on vessels arriving in the United States after having called at any port in Libya during their last five port calls.

The USCG has determined that Libya is not maintaining effective anti-terrorism measures in all of its ports. Actions required as listed in paragraphs C and D of this Port Security Advisory take effect for all vessels that arrive in the United States on or after April 24, 2015, after visiting ports in Libya as one of the their last five ports of call.

Furthermore, vessels are advised to proceed with extreme caution when approaching all Libyan oil terminals, particularly in eastern Libya, due to potential violent and criminal activity based upon recent attempts by armed, non-state actors to engage in illicit export of oil. UN Security Council Resolution 2146 authorizes the UN Sanctions Committee to impose certain measures on vessels attempting to illicitly export crude oil from Libya. This resolution imposes several restrictions regarding loading, transporting, or discharging crude oil from Libya which may include the possible denial of port entry.

Vessels that visited the countries listed in paragraph B (with exceptions noted) on or after the effective date in paragraph A, during their last five port calls will be boarded or examined by the Coast Guard to ensure the vessel took the required actions. Failure to properly implement the actions listed in paragraph C.1 through C.5 may result in delay or denial of entry into the United States.

Find latest PSA 2-15 LIBYA FINAL for your reference.

Water Mist Systems – PSC detentions

18 Μαΐου, 2015 | Posted by admin in MOU | PARIS MOU | PSC | SOLAS | USCG - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο Water Mist Systems – PSC detentions)

The Republic of the Marshall Islands has issued a marine safety advisory regarding some recent PSC Detentions due to issues with water mist systems.

We would like to emphasise the importance of having all water mist systems fully operational, all the time.

The majority of the detentions regarding the water mist systems on foreign flagged vessels entering US ports were related to the system being in “manual” mode instead of “automatic” mode. In several cases, the water supply valve was found closed, rendering the water mist system “not readily available for immediate use”.

The recommendations include paying close attention to valve alignment as well as ensuring that there is adequate labelling reminding the crew on board that critical fixed firefighting equipment must be made available for immediate use. The water mist control panels must be kept in “automatic” mode (and power supply turned “on”).

Special attention should be given to verify these settings prior to entering a U.S. port.

The full text of the Marine Safety Advisory can be found herein.

Notice of Arrival/Departure Changes – USA

24 Αυγούστου, 2013 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο Notice of Arrival/Departure Changes – USA)

The United States Coast Guard (USCG) will no longer be accepting old versions of the electronic Notice of Arrival Departure (NOAD).

As of the 13th August 2013, the USCG will no longer accept Notice of Arrival/Departure (NOAD) Workbook (Ver. 6.0) as well as all other prior USCG NOAD workbooks, and all non-USCG NOAD workbooks. 

From the 22nd October 2013, they will also not accept Notice of Arrival/Departure (NOAD) InfoPath Template 6.0 or 6.1, Workbook 7.0, and OCS Notice of Arrival (NOA) Workbook 1.0.

Shipping companies are advised to ensure that they are using NOAD InfoPath Template 6.2.1, NOAD Workbook 7.1 or OCS Notice of Arrival (NOA) Workbook 1.1 as soon as possible. 

Current workbooks may be downloaded from the Downloads section of the NVMC website.

The USCG requests that the Workbooks are completed electronically and then sent via email or imported into the eNOAD web application.  Alteration of the official workbook could result in significant delays in processing.

USCG – implementing MLC 2006

2 Αυγούστου, 2013 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG – implementing MLC 2006)

The US Coast Guard issued a Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) providing guidance for Coast Guard marine inspectors, recognized classification societies (RCSs), and US vessel owners/operators on the US laws and regulations or other measures conforming to the provisions of the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC 2006) and providing a voluntary inspection program for those who wish to document compliance with the standards of MLC 2006.  NVIC 02-2013 (7/30/13).

USCG – Top ten Cargo Vessel deficiencies

14 Δεκεμβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG – Top ten Cargo Vessel deficiencies)

 Office of Investigations & Analysis Commandant (CG-545) conducted an analysis of all deficiencies recorded by CG Marine Inspectors while inspecting certificated commercial vessels (other than Offshore Supply Vessels) under Subchapter I. The purpose of this analysis was to identify the ten most common deficiencies to share with the owners/operators so they can take corrective actions onboard their vessels, ensure continual compliance with safety and environmental requirements, and so that problems can be rectified prior to scheduling the next Coast Guard examination.

Click here to read the  top ten deficiencies, including a brief explanation of the deficiency, applicable regulation, and potential correction methods.

USCG – Issuance of IEE Certificates

11 Δεκεμβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG – Issuance of IEE Certificates)

The Coast Guard is amending its Vessel Inspection Alternatives regulations to add the International Energy Efficiency (IEE) Certificate to the list of certificates that a recognized classification society may issue on behalf of the Coast Guard.

Tthey are making this change because Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution by Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978, has been amended to address energy efficiency for ships, and these amendments call for the issuance of IEE Certificates starting January 1, 2013.This rule will enable recognized classification societies to apply to the Coast Guard to issue IEE Certificates to vessel owners and help to ensure that the demand for IEE Certificates is met.

This final rule is effective as from January 9, 2013.

 

USCG – Ballast Water Management Guidance

28 Νοεμβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG – Ballast Water Management Guidance)

The United States Coast Guard (USCG) is undertaking efforts to provide  guidance to marine inspectors, port State control officers, and stakeholders regarding its March  2012 ballast water management (BWM) regulations.

Its new “Evaluating a Vessel’s Ballast  Water Management Plan” is intended to address not only the basic BWM procedures, but also  sediment removal and biofouling maintenance.

A power point presentation (which includes  audio narration if you double-click on the loudspeaker icon in the middle of each slide) should  enhance understanding of and compliance with the regulations.

Drug enforcement activity and Fines – USA

20 Οκτωβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο Drug enforcement activity and Fines – USA)

Recent cases cost the UK P&I Club almost $500K in fines after United States Coast Guard (USCG) and Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officers searched and found significant quantities of Cocaine onboard three entered vessels.

In these particular cases the Cocaine was found on vessels which had recently operated in the Central or South American regions. As these regions are the source of the majority of Cocaine which enters the United States the authorities are understandably more vigilant in their anti-drug trafficking duties towards vessels which operate in these areas.

It is a necessity to implement and maintain high levels of vigilance when in these regions so as to better protect themselves against drug traffickers.

Preventative measures include;

  1. Having a watchman on the gangway at all times and admitting no person onboard the vessel unless they are a crew member and have photo ID, is a Customs official with proper identification or have been pre-approved to board by the Master.

  2. Limiting access to non-essential areas of the ship to stevedores.

  3. Escorting embarked visitors at all times when in accommodation areas.

  4. Searching bags and hold-all of persons embarking the vessel at the gangway (to include all visitors, stevedores and crew returning from shore leave).

Source : UK P&I Club

USCG -Biofouling Management Plan requirement

19 Οκτωβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG -Biofouling Management Plan requirement)

In continuation of our previous post ,

The revised US Coast Guard (USCG) regulations on ballast water management entered into force 21 June 2012. A specific ballast water management (BWM) plan is required for each vessel and shall include inter alia; procedures for detailed fouling maintenance.

The requirements in USCG 33 CFR §151.2050 (g) is seen as US approach to implement biofouling requirements. USCG has also indicated that carrying a Biofouling Management Plan in accordance with the guidelines in MEPC.207(62) is one way of fulfilling the requirements in USCG paragraph (g). However USCG does not require an approved Biofouling Management Plan, it requires the ship to adequately address biofouling management in its shipboard procedures. USCG requires “how” to be documented in the BWM Plan.

MEPC.207(62) gives the following guidelines on what a Biofouling Management Plan should include:

  1. Ship specific procedures.

  2. Description of the operating profile.

  3. Details of the anti-fouling systems and operational treatments used.

  4. Mapping of hull locations susceptible to biofouling.

  5. Schedule of planned inspections, repairs, maintenance and renewal of anti-fouling systems.

  6. Procedures for the disposal of biological waste generated by treatment or cleaning processes (by the crew).

  7. A Biofouling Record Book, wherein details of all inspections and biofouling management measures undertaken on the ship are recorded.Altho the above US legislation does not require a biofouling record book it is recommended to maintain a record of activities regarding removal of sediments as recommended in MEPC 207_62

  8. A Biofouling Management Plan does not need to be approved by USCG.

It is recommended shipowners to establish a Biofouling Management Plan for each ship in accordance with MEPC.207(62), and include a reference to this plan in the ballast water management plan.

USCG – Guidance implementing the AFS Convention

19 Οκτωβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο USCG – Guidance implementing the AFS Convention)

The US Coast Guard issued a policy letter providing guidance to US vessels and to foreign vessels calling in US waters on compliance with the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships (AFS Convention). The policy letter addresses domestic vessel inspections and certifications, as well as port state control (PSC) procedures for foreign vessels.

Starting on November 21, 2012, US flagged vessels, wherever located, and foreign flagged vessels in the United States, in any port, shipyard, offshore terminal, or other place in the US, lightering in the territorial sea of the US, or anchoring in the territorial sea of the US, must comply with the applicable portions of the AFS Convention. The type of anti- fouling systems controlled (prohibited) are specified in Annex 1 of the Convention. The Coast Guard implements the AFS Convention through reference (a), (33 U.S.C. §§ 3801-3857). Compliance verification for US and foreign vessels shall follow the process and scope as described in the applicable portions of this policy letter.

Port State Control Procedures are also outlined in this policy letter.

Click here to read the policy letter CG-CVC 12-08 dtd 15/10/2012 .

 

Port State Control (PSC) within North American Emission Control Area (ECA) under MARPOL ANNEX VI by U.S. Coast Guard

3 Οκτωβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο Port State Control (PSC) within North American Emission Control Area (ECA) under MARPOL ANNEX VI by U.S. Coast Guard)

As already advised in post http://www.ombros-consulting.com/?p=1265 , the North American ECA has been enforced to apply MARPOL ANNEX VI Reg.14 on 1 August 2012. In relation to the above, U.S. Coast Guard published the PSC procedure and actions in Section 2 of “ECA JOB AID and the Transport Canada Marine Safety published 12 Inspection items at PSC in “Emission Control Area-North America”.

Furthermore, U.S. EPA published “Interim Guidance on the Non-Availability of Compliant Fuel Oil for the North American Emission Control Area”.

With referring the documents mentioned above, it should be a verification the vessel intend to the ECA which comply with Reg.14 and review SMS procedures related to ISM Code 1.4, 5, 7, 9 & 10 in relation to Reg. 14.

EPA Requirements

The EPA expects that residual fuel oil with a sulphur content below the prescribed limit of 1.00% m/m will be available from suppliers covering the North American Emission Control Area (ECA). However, if a vessel is unable to obtain compliant fuel oil prior to entering the North American ECA despite its “best efforts” and cannot fulfil the requirements by using a permissible equivalent method (for example, exhaust gas cleaning)it must submit a Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report to the US government and, as required by MARPOL Annex VI/18.2.4, to the vessel’s Flag State Administration. The US government will then consider the steps that were taken in an effort to obtain compliant fuel oil and determine what further action, if any, will be required. Fuel Oil Non-Availability Reports are to be submitted at the earliest opportunity, but no later than 96 hours prior to the vessel entering the North American ECA. Such reports are to be submitted electronically.Information concerning the on-line reporting system will be published on the EPA and USCG websites (under Domestic Vessels/Domestic Vessels General/MARPOL ANNEX VI) .

The term “best efforts” is defined by the EPA as including “but not limited to, investigating alternate sources of fuel oil prior to commencing your voyage or in route prior to entering the North American ECA.” A vessel would not be expected to deviate from its planned voyage in order to stem compliant fuel oil. However, if compliant fuel oil is available at a previous port, the vessel will be expected to bunker the required low sulphur fuel oil even if this involves shifting the vessel within harbour limits.

Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report Content

In keeping with MARPOL Annex VI/18.2, the EPA states that the following information should be included in the Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report:

  1. “The vessel’s name, flag, and IMO identification number or other relevant registration number;

  2. A copy (or description) of the ship’s voyage plan in place at the time of entry into the North American ECA, including the vessel’s port of origin and port of destination, and the name of the first U.S. port of arrival;

  3. When the vessel first received notice it would be conducting a voyage involving transit in the North American ECA, and the vessel’s location when it first received such notice;

  4. The date and time the ship operator expects to enter and exit the North American ECA, as well as the projected days on which the ship’s main propulsion engines will be in operation;

  5. The sulphur content of the fuel oil that will be used when entering and operating in the North American ECA;

  6. A description of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance prior to entering the North American ECA, including a description of all attempts that were made to locate alternative sources of compliant fuel oil, and a description of the reason why compliant fuel oil was not available (e.g., compliant fuel oil was not available at ports on “intended voyage;” fuel oil supply disruptions at port; etc. As mentioned above, the United States government does not consider the cost of compliant fuel oil to be a valid basis for claiming the non-availability of compliant fuel oil). Include names and addresses of the fuel oil suppliers contacted and the dates on which the contact was made;

  7. In cases of fuel oil supply disruption, the name of the port at which the vessel was scheduled to receive compliant fuel oil and the name of the fuel oil supplier that is now reporting the non-availability of compliant fuel oil;

  8. If applicable, identify and describe any operational constraints that prevented you from using available compliant fuel oil, for example with respect to viscosity or other fuel oil parameters. Specify steps you have taken, or are taking, to resolve these operational constraints that will allow you to use all commercially available residual fuel oil blends;

  9. The availability of compliant fuel oil at the first port of call in the United States, and your plans to obtain that fuel oil;

  10. If compliant fuel oil is not available at the first port of call in the United States, the lowest sulphur content of available fuel oil, or the lowest sulphur content of available fuel oil at the next port of call in the United States;

  11. If the vessel has operated in the North American ECA in the prior 12 months, provide the names of all U.S. ports visited, the dates of the port calls, and whether the vessel used compliant fuel oil;

  12. If the vessel or owner/operator has submitted a Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report to the United States government in the previous 12 months, identify the number of Fuel Oil Non-Availability Reports previously submitted, and provide details on the dates and ports previously visited while using non-compliant fuel oil; and

  13. All relevant contact information, including the ship master, ship operator, legal agent in the United States, ship owner, and any related parent companies. Also include a designated corporate official who is authorised to answer additional questions relating to claims of fuel oil unavailability and his or her full contact information.”

The EPA further advises that:

“The United States government will consider the information submitted in a Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report to be reliable only if the report is signed by an authorised representative of your company and contains the following affirmation:

I certify under penalty of law that the statements and information made herein are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for knowingly submitting false statements and information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001.”

Vessels that have Submitted a Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report

Vessels that have entered the North American ECA without compliant fuel oil on board are expected to obtain low sulphur fuel oil at the first available opportunity at a US port of call prior to onward passage. Sufficient low sulphur fuel oil is to be stemmed to allow the vessel to use compliant fuel oil for the remainder of its voyage within the North American ECA, and for any subsequent voyage where the vessel is due to transit the North American ECA and compliant fuel oil is not expected to be available at intervening ports.

If a vessel has been unable to obtain compliant fuel oil prior to entering the North American ECA, the EPA does not expect it to use distillate fuel oil in order to comply with the 1.00% m/m fuel oil sulphur limit.

Further Requirements

Not supplying a vessel with compliant low sulphur fuel oil prior to entering the North American ECA simply on the grounds of cost will not be considered as justification for failing to meet the regulatory requirements.

If a vessel or owner/operator submits repeated or multiple Fuel Oil Non-Availability Reports, the US authorities may require additional supporting documentation and may consider conducting enhanced inspections of the vessels concerned when calling at US ports.

Evidence of Compliance with the Regulatory Requirements

In addition to the foregoing, the EPA guidance also includes information on how a vessel may demonstrate compliance with the fuel oil requirements whilst operating in the North American ECA. Vessels are required to maintain the following documentary evidence, and if necessary, make it available to authorised government personnel on demand:

  1. Bunker delivery notes (as required by MARPOL Annex VI/18.5)

  2. Representative fuel oil samples taken at the time of delivery (as required by MARPOL Annex VI/18.8.1)

  3. Fuel oil changeover procedures (as required by MARPOL Annex VI/14.6)

  4. Fuel oil changeover logbook (as required by MARPOL Annex VI/14.6)

US government personnel may also verify compliance by other available means, such as taking samples of fuel oil from tanks and lines for analysis, and sampling and analysing exhaust gases.

Source: ClassNK ,  West of England

Ratification by the US of Anti-Fouling Systems Convention

8 Σεπτεμβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο Ratification by the US of Anti-Fouling Systems Convention)

By AFS.1/Circ.49 the IMO is stating that the US has submitted its instrument of ratification for the Anti-Fouling Systems (AFS) Convention.

The instrument of ratification of the United States of America contained the following declaration:
“… pursuant to article 16(2)(f)(ii)(3) of the Convention, amendments to Annex 1 of the Convention shall enter into force for the United States of America only after notification to the Secretary-General of its acceptance with respect to such amendments.”

The Convention will enter into force for the United States of America on 21 November 2012, in accordance with the provisions of article 18(3).
There are, at present, sixty-one Contracting States to the Convention, representing approximately 80.22%*of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping.

*This tonnage percentage is based on world tonnage figures provided by IHS-Fairplay, effective as of 31 December 2011. Tonnage figures are liable to fluctuate from year to year.

Click here to read AFS.1/Circ.49

PSA 1-12 / Conditions of entry for vessels arriving at U.S. ports from certain countries

5 Σεπτεμβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο PSA 1-12 / Conditions of entry for vessels arriving at U.S. ports from certain countries)

The U.S. Coast Guard has announced that, effective 18 September 2012, it is imposing conditions of entry on vessels arriving in the United States after having called at any  port in the Republic of Yemen, with the exception of the Ash Shihr Terminal, the Balhalf LNG  Terminal and the port of Hodeidah.

Any vessel arriving in the United States that called in any of the countries listed on pages 2-3 of PSA (with exceptions noted) during its previous five (5) port calls must take actions 1 through 5 listed  below:

1. Implement measures per the ship’s security plan equivalent to Security Level 2;

2. Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded and that the guards have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel. Guards may be:

 – provided by the ship’s crew, however, additional crewmembers should be placed on the ship if necessary to ensure that limits on maximum hours of work are not exceeded and/or minimum hours of rest are met, or

– provided by outside security forces approved by the ship’s master and Company Security Officer.

3. Attempt to execute a Declclaration of Security;

4. Log all security actions in the ship’s log; and

5. Report actions taken to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port (COTP) prior to arrival in the United States.

Masters of vessels arriving at a U.S. port whose last five (5) port calls included a port in a listed country (with exceptions noted) should expect that the U.S. Coast Guard will board their vessel at sea in order to ensure that the required actions were complied with. Failure to properly implement the above conditions of entry while in a port in one of the listed countries will most likely result in the vessel being denied entry into the United States.

Based on the findings of the Coast Guard boarding or examination, the vessels subject to the conditions of entry shown on page 1 may be required to ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded by armed security guards and that they have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel while in U.S. ports. The number and location of the guards must be acceptable to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port. For those vessels that have demonstrated good security compliance and can document that they took the measures called for in items 1 through 4 above, the armed security guard requirement will normally be waived.

However, vessels that visited Monrovia, Liberia (Firestone Facility and Port of Liberia) during their last five port calls prior to entering the United States will not normally be boarded at sea by the Coast Guard unless other targeting factors apply, nor will these vessels be required to provide armed security guards while in ports of the United States.

Owners and operators of vessels that are due to arrive in a U.S. port after calling at a port in any of the countries listed above are strongly urged to review the conditions of entry prior to their vessel arriving at a port in one of these countries.

Click here to download the new PSA1-12.

PSA 01-11 still remains in affect;

PSA 4-11 is cancelled.

Source: USCG

U.S. Coast Guard’s release of revisions to its Ballast water FAQs

3 Σεπτεμβρίου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο U.S. Coast Guard’s release of revisions to its Ballast water FAQs)

The U.S. Coast Guard recently released revisions to its ballast water Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the Standards for Living Organisms in Ships Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters regulations.

These FAQs may be read here.

Refer also to our previous post for more information.

 

“Standards for Living Organisms in Ship’s Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters”

10 Μαΐου, 2012 | Posted by admin in Χωρίς κατηγορία - (Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο “Standards for Living Organisms in Ship’s Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters”)

The United State Coast Guard (USCG) is amending its regulations on ballast water management by establishing a standard for the allowable concentration of living organisms in ships’ ballast water discharged in waters of the United States.This rule is entitled as “Standards for Living Organisms in Ship’s Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. waters”, Vol. 77,Federal Register Reg. 17254, on 23 March 2012 (BWDS).

BWDS will become effective on 21 June 2012 after 90 days of issuance this rule.

The Coast Guard is also amending its regulations for engineering equipment by establishing an approval process for ballast water management systems. These new regulations will aid in controlling the introduction and spread of nonindigenous species from ships’ ballast water in waters of the United States.

BWDS is applied to all merchant vessels equipped with ballast tanks that,after operating on the waters beyond the Exchusive Econimic Zone during any part of its voyage,enter U.S. waters.

For more information click here . Also refer to Class NKK TEC 0903